Growers Network was created as a resource for adults in the cannabis industry.

Please verify your age to enter.

US 10th Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments about Colorado's Cannabis Laws


They’re taking the conventional approach – using the supremacy clause to argue that federal controlled substance laws and racketeering laws supersede the will of voters in Denver.

The problem with this line of reasoning is that we have historical precedent. It was called the 18th amendment (aka Prohibition), and it was repealed by state ratification in the form of the 21st amendment. In this case, cannabis isn’t part of a constitutional disagreement, but a specific law, so the anti-cannabis side has an even weaker argument.

The other issue with this line of argument is a majority of states (32) have legal medicinal cannabis, 8 of which have legal recreational cannabis. If a majority of states disagree with federal law… well, the federal law needs to be called into question. And it’s not just states either – the majority of voters think cannabis should be legal.

1 Like

This is good news then… Everyone knows the reasons for not being legal is very weak to non-objectionable. The writer here puts forth that this case could be used as a counter claim, to remove cannabis as a federally controlled substance.


Fingers crossed for a win. It will be good to get this precedent on the books.

1 Like