Growers Network was created as a resource for adults in the cannabis industry.

Please verify your age to enter.

Don't Tread on My Meds

#1

Reminder: the War is NOT over, people! In a strange turn of legal events, concentrates or “hashish” products have once again been made illegal in the State of Arizona. As the rest of the world makes giant steps forward in terms of legalization, it seems politicians in this state take two giant leaps back.

This essentially puts our state back into the black (market) for all cannabis in concentrated forms. Now, that vape cartridge, capsule, wax, vial of tincture, edible, grinder with keif, and yes, even the RSO you might need for therapeutic relief or even to save your life could once again land you in jail. Certain jurisdictions have even begun to aggressively enforce the new version of our law. Legal MMJ cardholders should be terrified!

There will be no legal clarification for the foreseeable future. At least not in 2018. If you as a legal, card-holding AZ patient get busted with anything that can be construed as a concentrate or extract, get ready to hang in jail until AFTER the mid-term election.

I wanted to post the official dispensary response to the Jones ruling for all the GNET members to read, if nothing else, to reflect on the current state of the industry as it stands in AZ…and maybe leave you, as we are, wondering “Why?..”

From Mike Colburn at Level Up Dispensary:

“On Tuesday, June 26th, the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, in State v. Jones, affirmed a conviction of a medical marijuana patient in possession of “hashish” “under the circumstances presented” in that case. Due to what we believe to be much misinformation about Jones, we feel compelled to present our position on this matter.

In Jones, a medical marijuana cardholder was in possession of “hashish” which he admitted he received “for free” when “an employee at a marijuana dispensary in Phoenix had given” it to him (Answering Brief). To be clear, Jones only involves a transaction between two individuals and specifically does not address a transaction between a state-licensed dispensary and a patient.

The court held that “hashish is ‘the resin’ extracted’ from the marijuana plant,’ criminalized as cannabis, a narcotic drug, and distinct from marijuana.” Importantly, the majority opinion in Jones does not mention concentrates or vape cartridges, and it states that the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”) protects patients in possession of allowable amounts of mixtures or preparations of medical marijuana, including “brownies and the like.”

We received many questions from patients and others as to the meaning of Jones. While we disagree with the reasoning in Jones, as some have interpreted it, please note that we do not sell “hashish.” Any products sold under our brand are medical marijuana and mixtures or preparations thereof, under strict regulations from the Arizona Department of Health Services (“ADHS”). The AMMA defines usable marijuana to mean “the dried flowers of the marijuana plant, and any mixture or preparation thereof.” A.R.S. § 36-2801(8) and (15).

We and many dispensaries contacted ADHS personnel for guidance. ADHS has confirmed that nothing has changed on their end, and that people should read the rules and statutes for guidance. ADHS regulations provide that a dispensary is required to provide a copy of its bylaws specifying whether the dispensary plans to “[p]repare, sell, or dispense marijuana-infused nonedible products.” Ariz. Admin. Code R9-17-304©(8)(b)(vi). According to ADHS’s dispensary handbook, non-edible products include “any nonedible items, such as concentrates, sold that contain medical marijuana” and must be labeled with the amount of marijuana they contain. ADHS, Medical Marijuana Verification System Dispensary Handbook, at 11 (published June 8, 2017) (emphasis added). Importantly, the majority in Jones did not address ADHS regulations.

The regulations and handbook confirm that all forms of medical marijuana—including the concentrates derived from medical marijuana—are subject to the protections of the AMMA. The foregoing reasoning and analysis come directly from the dissenting opinion in Jones, were not addressed by the majority in Jones, and as of now remain unaddressed by ADHS.

While we disagree with Jones, which should, and we understand will be appealed, it is not yet final. We also do not believe that Jones applies to the medicine—including mixtures or preparations of medical marijuana—that we sell to our patients under ADHS regulations. If we hear or receive any information from ADHS (our regulatory body) that is contrary to the foregoing, we will take the appropriate action immediately.

The information contained herein is provided as our position for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter.”

And here’s the citation

6 Likes
#2

Thank you for information.

2 Likes
#3

No one should be surprised by the action taken here…AMBIGUITY has been a favorite technique in the "war on drugs " since the beginning. Consider the flush language in the IRC Sec. 280E statute:

> No deduction or credit shall be allowed for any amount paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business if such trade or business (or the activities which comprise such trade or business) consists of trafficking in controlled substances (within the meaning of schedule I and II of the Controlled Substances Act) which is prohibited by Federal law or the law of any State in which such trade or business is conducted

Imagine what would have happened if the “OR” in the last line of the statute was changed to AND.

2 Likes
#4

Beyond how incredibly stupid this is, it pisses me off that these backwards dickheads are gonna fight this tooth and nail until the fundamentalist bribes they’re getting are smaller than the money they could make off of legalizing it. Then they’ll get to roll in the dough they fought so hard against. They’ve really carved a win-win for themselves out of this, haven’t they?

2 Likes