What’s really interesting about this case is that it sounds ripe for a Supreme Court Appeal.
Why? Well, here the Illinois AG is basically saying that IDEA mandates the use of cannabis oil for this child, which is in direct conflict with the CSA. In theory, we have two conflicting federal laws, which can only mean the Supreme Court really gets the say on the matter.
Now granted, the case would have to be appealed up to the Supreme Court, but I find this particular case interesting.
What are your thoughts?