This worries me as a grower. 
Read @tom4 info. There is a lot of data with his products in a large number of industries.
From the voices in my head
Ethan
3 Likes
Ethan,
Please, why associate our all natural product to that??? I suggest you do a little more research on our product.
Voice in my head
2 Likes
@neville, why do I not want this is the grow or am I just wrong. I can see it in the post harvest side but not the grow side.
Maybe in my waist air handing but on the food side?
From the voices in my head
Ethan
Great read! I am interested in seeing more data when you get it.
Thanks Yan!
1 Like
White paper suggests peer review. This seems to be a self published paper and the data is a little slim. Maybe I missed it but did you ensure equal ppfd at the canopy or was the control lower ppfd due to the absence of the extra light species spectra?
5 Likes
Ethan, interesting. Can you share the big pharma publication on cannabinoid precursor?
1 Like
Sure,
I posted it here, but the original citations are at both NIH.gov and at USDA.gov. I posted the article on GN in the last 2 or three months. It is a paper on root hair culture in the product of pharmaceutical canabinods, a proposed
methodology. The citations are out of this world.
Yan, please PM me so I can give you the my full literature search. It is all public record, sources. Some of the publication, I have to go to the U and login to get the for fee journals, for free. I am not a member of a journal
agrogater, since retirement, plus I like a good reasurch library. Nostalgia. 
From the voices in my head
Ethan Kayes
2 Likes
Average dry weight under UV-A and Far-Red supplement:
135 grams
• Average dry weight of the control: 72.5 grams
Would you attribute the almost doubled yield to UV or Far-Red supplementation?
2 Likes